EPHA Conference Systems, 31st EPHA Annual Conference

Font Size: 
The burden of traditional neonatal uvulectomy among admissions at neonatal intensive care units, South Gondar Zone, 2019: A mixed method study
Wubet Alebachew

Last modified: 2020-02-25

Abstract


Introduction: Traditional neonatal uvulectomy is unsupervised, unscientific and potentially dangerous cultural malpractice. This malpractice is often accompanied with life threatening neonatal morbidities such as infection, anemia, aspiration and oropharyngeal injury. However, there is no current regional and even national data about the burden, associated factors and reasons of traditional uvulectomy among neonatal hospital admissions.

Methods: A quantitative cross sectional study supplemented with phenomenological study was employed on 422 mother-neonate pairs admitted to Debre Tabor General Hospital from September 2018 to August 2019. Eight women who were not included in the quantitative part were considered to be key informant for the qualitative study. Systematic and purposive sampling methods were used to select study participants for the quantitative and qualitative study respectively.

Result: Complications of traditional uvulectomy contributed 35.90% of the overall neonatal admissions. At admission, most of the victim neonates had sepsis (88.12%) followed by anemia (55.23%). From multivariable analysis, having male neonate [AOR= 4.87; 95% CI: 1.10, 21.59], antenatal couple counseling about traditional neonatal uvulectomy [AOR=0.053; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.35], home delivery [AOR= 6.02 ; 95% CI: 1.15, 31.61], postnatal couple counseling about traditional neonatal uvulectomy [AOR= 0.101; 95% CI:  0.02,  0.65] and knowing at least one disadvantage of traditional neonatal uvulectomy [AOR= 0.068; 95% CI:  0.01, 0.44] were significant factors. Furthermore, maternal perception of “there is no modern medicine to treat elongated neonatal uvula” was the most explained reason to do the malpractice.

Conclusion and recommendation: The burden of traditional uvulectomy was high. Fortunately, its predictors are modifiable. Therefore, different community groups including women health development armies, elders, religious fathers, health professionals and criminal prosecutors should be actively mobilized against this malpractice. Besides, parental couple counseling about the key message of ‘no traditional neonatal uvulectomy’ should be properly implemented in the routine antenatal and postnatal programs of the health care delivery system at South Gondar Zone.

Key words: Traditional uvulectomy, Debre Tabor General Hospital